انتخاب زبان
آمریکا
English (English) Kreyòl Ayisyen (Haitian Creole) Português (Brasil) (Portuguese (Brazil)) Español (Spanish)
اروپا
Afrikaans (Afrikaans) Shqip (Albanian) Հայերեն (Armenian) Azərbaycanca (Azerbaijani) башҡорт (Bashkir) Euskara (Basque) Беларуская (Belarusian) Bosanski (Bosnian) brezhoneg (Breton) Български (Bulgarian) Català (Catalan) Hrvatski (Croatian) Čeština (Czech) Dansk (Danish) Nederlands (Dutch) Esperanto (Esperanto) Eesti (Estonian) Føroyskt (Faroese) Suomi (Finnish) Français (French) Galego (Galician) Deutsch (German) Ελληνικά (Greek) Magyar (Hungarian) Íslenska (Icelandic) Gaeilge (Irish) Italiano (Italian) Latina (Latin) Latviešu (Latvian) Lietuvių (Lithuanian) Lëtzebuergesch (Luxembourgish) Македонски (Macedonian) Malti (Maltese) Norsk (Norwegian) Norsk bokmål (Norwegian Bokmål) occitan (Occitan) Polski (Polish) Português (Portuguese) Română (Romanian) Русский (Russian) Српски (Serbian) Slovenčina (Slovak) Slovenščina (Slovenian) Svenska (Swedish) татар (Tatar) Türkçe (Turkish) Türkmen (Turkmen) Українська (Ukrainian) Cymraeg (Welsh)
آسیا و اقیانوسیه
অসমীয়া (Assamese) বাংলা (Bengali) မြန်မာ (Burmese) 简体中文 (Chinese (Simplified)) 繁體中文 (Chinese (Traditional)) ქართული (Georgian) ગુજરાતી (Gujarati) ʻŌlelo Hawaiʻi (Hawaiian) हिन्दी (Hindi) Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian) 日本語 (Japanese) Jawa (Javanese) ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada) Қазақ (Kazakh) ខ្មែរ (Khmer) 한국어 (Korean) Кыргызча (Kyrgyz) ລາວ (Lao) Bahasa Melayu (Malay) മലയാളം (Malayalam) Māori (Maori) मराठी (Marathi) Монгол (Mongolian) नेपाली (Nepali) ଓଡ଼ିଆ (Odia) ਪੰਜਾਬੀ (Punjabi) संस्कृत भाषा (Sanskrit) සිංහල (Sinhala) Basa Sunda (Sundanese) Tagalog (Tagalog) Тоҷикӣ (Tajik) தமிழ் (Tamil) తెలుగు (Telugu) ไทย (Thai) བོད་སྐད་ (Tibetan) Oʻzbekcha (Uzbek) Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
خاورمیانه و آفریقا
አማርኛ (Amharic) العربية (Arabic) Hausa (Hausa) עברית (Hebrew) Igbo (Igbo) Kinyarwanda (Kinyarwanda) Kurdî (Kurdish) lingála (Lingala) Malagasy (Malagasy) پښتو (Pashto) فارسی (Persian) chiShona (Shona) سنڌي (Sindhi) Soomaali (Somali) Kiswahili (Swahili) ትግርኛ (Tigrinya) اردو (Urdu) Wolof (Wolof) isiXhosa (Xhosa) ייִדיש (Yiddish) Yorùbá (Yoruba) isiZulu (Zulu)

Devils Wear Prada 2 Why We Seeing behind

Devils Wear Prada 2 Why We Seeing behind

Devils Wear Prada 2 Why We Seeing behind Devils Wear Prada 2 Why We... Devils Wear Prada 2... verguv verguv's School
رایگان همین حالا شروع کنید!

چه چیزی یاد خواهید گرفت؟

درباره دوره

You're referring to "The Devil Wears Prada 2" or the sequel to the 2006 film "The Devil Wears Prada". However, it's essential to note that there hasn't been an official announcement or release of a sequel to the film.

That being said, there have been rumors and discussions about a potential sequel over the years. In 2019, Anne Hathaway, who played the role of Andy Sachs in the original film, expressed interest in revisiting the character and the universe of "The Devil Wears Prada".

In addition, the original film's writer, Aline Brosh McKenna, has also hinted at the possibility of a sequel or a spin-off. However, there hasn't been any official confirmation from the studios or the cast members.

It's worth noting that the original film's ending was intentionally left open to allow for a potential sequel. The final scene shows Andy Sachs (Anne Hathaway) as a senior editor at Runway magazine, leaving the possibility for her character to continue her journey in the fashion industry.

As for why we might be seeing a potential sequel now, it's likely due to the resurgence of interest in the original film and its themes, particularly in the context of the #MeToo movement and the ongoing conversation about workplace harassment and sexism in the fashion industry.

If a sequel were to happen, it would likely explore new themes and storylines while still staying true to the spirit of the original film. However, until an official announcement is made, it's all speculation at this point.
اطلاعات بیشتر

verguv verguv's School

Learn online with verguv verguv
فناوری